The biggest ratio away from respondents completing the brand new baseline questionnaire was basically out-of Dalhousie College (49
6%) followed closely by brand new School of Saskatchewan (26.7%) and Memorial University (23.7%). Participant properties was described inside the Dining table step one. The 2 correct-hands columns associated with the desk expose frequencies among sufferers that have done data collection by the second (T2) and you may last (T3) go out items. The greater speed out of profitable go after-up within Dalhousie was the only real factor ranging from completers and non-completers, pick Desk step 1.
New mean ages of new participants is 23.8 age (practical deviation dos.6) and 73% regarding participants was female. While the observed in Dining table 2, there is no major difference in very early and you can later input teams, for each randomization. Not one of your baseline variations seen in Table dos, was in fact statistically tall (p-beliefs perhaps not found, all the > 0.05). Most participants (85.4%) indicated knowing a member of family otherwise friend that have a psychological infection.
The internal consistency of the OMS-HC in this sample, measured using Cronbach’s alpha, was 0.84 at baseline, 0.85 at T2 and 0.86, at T3. We initially assessed the homogeneity of the intervention effect across study sites by assessing group by centre interaction. As there were three sites, a likelihood ratio test was used to jointly assess the two resulting interaction terms. This was non-significant (p = 0.76), confirming the homogeneity and justifying a pooling of the analysis across the three centres. At baseline, OMS-HC scale scores did not differ significantly between early and late intervention groups (mean scores 46.5 versus 47.8, t = ?0.95, p<0.34). Read More